ADVERTISEMENT

2015 Results in relation to 2011-2013 Recruiting Rankings

Ralph Amsden

Moderator
Moderator
May 1, 2013
7,444
13,474
113
40
I think it's fair to say that this year's results should have been in part determined by the talent accumulated from the 2011, 2012 and 2013 recruiting classes.

Here's how some of the better recruiting teams did this year- average signing day class rank from 2011-2013 in parenthesis:

*indicates coaching change

Alabama: 12-1 (1)
Arkansas: 7-5 (28)
Arizona: 6-6 (46)
Arizona State: 6-6 (43)- Jumps to average 31st from 2012-2014
Auburn: 8-3 (8)
Baylor: 9-3 (44)
Cal: 7-5 (24)
Clemson: 13-0 (12)
Florida: 10-2 (6)
Florida State: 10-2 (8)
Georgia: 9-3 (6)*
Iowa: 12-1 (42)
Miami: 8-4 (22)*
Michigan: 9-3 (11)
Michigan State: 12-1 (37)
Nebraska: 5-7 (19)
Notre Dame: 10-2 (11)
North Carolina: 11-2 (34)
Ohio State: 11-1 (6)
Oklahoma: 11-1 (13)
Oklahoma State: 10-2 (32)
Ole Miss: 9-3 (22)
Oregon: 9-3 (15)
LSU: 8-3 (10)
South Carolina: 3-9 (18)
Stanford: 11-2 (30)
TCU: 10-2 (31)
Tennessee: 8-4 (17)
Texas: 5-7 (10)
Texas A&M: 8-4 (18)
Texas Tech: 7-5 (32)
UCLA: 8-4 (22)
USC: 8-5 (8)*
Virginia: 4-8 (27)*
Virginia Tech: 6-6 (29)*
Washington: 6-6 (21)


I bolded the teams I felt were the biggest disappointments, and italicized the ones whose results impressed me based on where their current upperclassmen graded out as a class. Any thoughts based on this data?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hod Rabino
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back